Dr. Hend Azhary joined us on Sunday, October 29th, 2017 to share her experience of the medical and humanitarian relief trip to the Syrian refugees in Jordan through the Syrian American Medical Society. In July, Dr. Azhary led a team of 65 medical providers, medical students, nurses and translators to provide primary and secondary health care to thousands of refugees in Zaatari camp and in clinics throughout Jordan.
Please keep humanitarians like Dr. Azhary in prayer and all who make a difference in the lives of others. God Bless you as you listen.
Below is the audio version of her sharing this experience with us and the type of difference that is being made to those who don’t have any other options.
In our house as in many homes, we have a small area that you step into when you enter the door from our driveway. Some call it simply an entry way or foyer, in New England and perhaps here as well, we call it a mud room.
Mud rooms are necessary spaces when you live on farms or you have a driveway that is gravel. It is a place to take off your muddy boots, jacket, rain gear, running shoes, gloves, mittens, scarfs, etc. In most mudrooms there will be a bench of some sort, a boot jack, and and in every mud room, worth its name, there will be a line of Shaker pegs along one or more walls. We have the pegs in our “mudroom” on two walls at different heights. And we keep on these pegs depending of the season, different jackets, hats scarfs, so forth, which we will grab and take with us as we go out the door.
Okay, now with this image in mind, let’s turn to the Gospel passage from Matthew. This reading covers two short accounts from Jesus’ ministry. I would like to focus on the first selection.
Verses 34-40 comprise what for Jesus was his definition of true religion, his summary of the law and the prophets – the law spelling out what God requires in written form, the prophets speaking this law into particular situations.
First there is the command to love God with everything we have. Now if this is considered simply as a human requirement, it can lead to frustration, because if we are honest we have times when we may not feel at all loving, even toward God! But the heart of spirituality is mutuality, that is, love for God is like faith, a gift from God. We find that God gives us the love we have for God, so that the Holy Spirit is bearing witness in our hearts that we belong to God, through Jesus Christ.
For me this love for God is expressed not only in my devotion to God through the worship of God but also in the way I approach all of God’s creation. I express my love for God not only through the prayers and songs in a service of worship but also in my service to the created world around me.
How can you say you love another person and then abuse that person’s property? How can I say I love God and then exploit and abuse God’s creation?
And the second commandment is like the first Jesus says, “You shall love you neighbor as yourself.” While it might be possible for a person to force themselves, almost as it were through gritted teeth, into loving their neighbor, by-in-large we claim that no one can command us to feel something we just don’t feel. But Jesus here is talking about “biblical love,” a love that is not a matter of “warm feelings” but rather a stubborn, unwavering commitment to another regardless of how we may “feel” about them at the time. I know that there are times when I’m not very likable! But Donna amazingly still loves me! (Or at least so she tells me!)
In our Tuesday Bible Study material the author spoke of this commitment to do love, to show love, as being a “setting of the heart.” A decision to act that then affects how we feel, no matter our mood or inclination at the time. Think of it as a setting on your dryer or washing machine. This is how we will choose to treat others.
I’ve found that when I decide to set my heart in a certain direction and I do things that fulfill that commitment; my feelings will often follow the actions. Many of the “laws” of God, like giving and Sabbath and loving, rather than being punitive or negative, I believe are God’s way of getting us to do what we need to do, what is good for us.
Back to the mud room!
Sometimes Eugene Peterson’s translation of the bible called The Message can create an inmage that brings scripture alive. This is how a portion of this our Matthew passage reads in The Message:
Jesus said, “’Love the Lord your God with all your passion and prayer and intelligence.’ This is the most important, the first on any list. But there is a second to set alongside it: ‘Love others as well as you love yourself.’ These two commandments are pegs; everything in God’s Law and the Prophets hangs from them.”
Love of God and Love of neighbor, two pegs on which hang spiritual attitudes that we are need to take with us when we go out into the world.
Scarfs to keep our hearts warm.
Hats to keep good thoughts in our minds.
Sturdy boots that will take you wherever God may call you.
Gloves, so that we can be the hands of God doing the work of love and an extra pair or two for it will require effort!
Perhaps even a strong vest or jacket that will protect your soul from all the stinging criticism, for even doing good, doing the right thing will bring criticism from some quarters. (Jesus warned us about this in his Sermon on the Mount.)
So rather than “what’s in your wallet? (another sermon?) What is hanging in your mud room? What do you take with you every time you step out into the world? What spiritual attributes, “gifts of the spirit” do you put on?
Now realizing that all metaphors are just this, metaphors, symbols and not the real thing, there is one especially important place where my peg metaphor breaks down, that is we should not take off these spiritual attitudes when we reenter our homes, for they are just as needed in our homes as they are in the world!
Listen to Pastor Neil’s audio recording of this sermon, spoken during 10:30 a.m. Worship services here at First Congregational… Enjoy!
People worry about their image. I used to more preoccupied with it than I am now! Weren’t you? As a teenager I was concerned about my image. For me, the image I wanted to portray was not the popular kid or the athlete but the quiet outdoorsy type, if you can believe that. But, even now I like to be seen in a positive light, a certain image. So to a certain extent I do want to fashion the image I wish to present to the world. We all do. And this doesn’t mean it is a false image but perhaps the image of who we believe we most truly are.
In the business world it is crucial to have a recognizable image. “Branding” they call it. You need to have a “brand” whether you are selling cars, an overnight stay, or caring for the spiritual welfare of souls as in the work of the church. We are told by the religious/spiritual marketing experts that churches need a “brand” and we need to promote or (to use the business terminology) market it! Because, the truth of it is, if we don’t promote one, a brand will be attached to us by the community and its perception what we do and/or do not do.
How do you suppose the world has branded First Congregational UCC? Is this how we want to be seen by our wider community? In other words, what is the first thought or image that comes into someone’s mind when they hear that you attend this church?
With this bit of introduction let’s look at the gospel reading for today.
This is the first of a series of three passages in Matthew’s gospel in which Jesus is being tested by Jewish religious leaders. Here the Pharisees quiz him about the lawfulness of paying taxes. This account is immediately followed by the Sadducees’ question about the resurrection which is an important theological point for them for they did not believe in the resurrection. (Matthew 22:23-33). Then (in next Sunday’s reading) the Pharisees are back with a question about the greatest commandment (Matthew 22:34-40). And finally, Jesus will respond with a question to the Pharisees about the Messiah in which Jesus pushes them on an interpretation of Psalm 110:1 (Matthew 22:41-46).
These four encounters follow Jesus’s teaching in the Jerusalem temple, during which he declines to say by what authority he is teaching, and then tells a series of parables which are highly critical of the religious authorities (Parable of the Two Sons, Parable of the Wicked Tenants, Parable of the Wedding Banquet). Matthew’s account culminates in Jesus’s warning to his followers: “The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses’ seat; therefore, do whatever they teach you and follow it; but do not do as they do, for they do not practice what they teach” (Matthew 23:2-3).
Today’s reading is a story which is often used as a basis for a reflection on the relationship between church and state. Which we know even today is far from settled! At the end of this month, October 31, the church will be marking the 500th anniversary of the beginning of the Reformation. This is the date that popular legend says a Roman Catholic monk and scholar, Martin Luther, nailed his 95 theses on the door of the Wittenberg Castle church. In actuality, he more likely just hung the document on the door of the church as an announcement of an upcoming academic discussion he was proposing. But his propositions were radical enough to result in what we call the Protestant Reformation.
It was Martin Luther’s reading of this passage in Matthew which helped him to develop his doctrine of the two kingdoms, which distinguished between God’s spiritual rule through the gospel and the church, and God’s political or secular rule, through law and the authorities of the state. In light of Jesus’ words Luther’s view about rendering or giving to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s was that, the soul is not under the authority of Caesar (the state); “he” can neither teach it nor guide it, neither kill it nor give it life, neither bind it nor loose it, neither judge it nor condemn it, neither hold it fast nor release it. … But with respect to body, property, and honor …, such matters are under Caesar’s (state) authority.
I dare say there might be a few today that would take some issue with Luther’s view! But Luther’s thinking impacted church and state relationships including the version of it which was established in the fledgling democracy of the thirteen colonies.
In place of Luther’s language of gospel and law, it seems more helpful to me to tie it into last week’s message about idols and explore the question of “ultimate belonging.” And ask the questio, “Ultimately, whose are we?”
Jesus asked for a coin. The coin … bears Caesar’s eikōn [image], and belongs to Caesar. Humans, on the other hand, bear the eikōn of God.
In the first account of creation Genesis 1:27 we read these familiar words:
So God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.
For Luther, people (back then only men) may pay the infamous poll tax among other taxes, but they do not belong to the emperor. Humans bear God’s image and wherever they live and operate –whether in the social, economic, political, or religious realm– they belong to God. Their primary loyalties do not switch (for Luther) when they move out of church and into the polling booth.
Human beings, made in the image of God, are called to belong to God.
As humankind, we are created to be in the image and likeness of God in our nature and in our thinking, in the way we behave and conduct ourselves, and in the words we speak. We are to be a reflection of God.
Now of course we are not created in the physical image of God for no one knows what God looks like! The Hebrew words translated image and likeness in Genesis do not convey any sense of physicality but refers to the nature and essence of God. We are like God in that we have the ability to understand, to reason, to create, to act and behave, to feel and see, to listen and speak, but most of all to show compassion, to love.
It was John who wrote in his letter, God is love. (1 John 4:8)
When asked by the lawyer about inheriting eternal life, Jesus in turn asked him, “What is in the law?” The lawyer, a man of reputation (perhaps worried about image) replied, “You shall love the God with all you heart, soul, strength, and mind; and love your neighbor as yourself.”
Do you recall how Jesus answered him? The Parable of the Good Samaritan.
As Jesus taught in many of his parables but perhaps most poignantly in the “Parable of the Good Samaritan” it is not about our status in the church (the priest) or the culture (the Levite) it is about how we love our neighbor.
Whose image do we ultimately bear?
I believe this in large part if not the whole, will be determined by how well we love!
Listen to our Audio version (click link below) on here… then if you would like what you hear… consider coming in and joining us on Sunday mornings!
“Why didn’t God let us die in comfort in Egypt where we had lamb stew and all the bread we could eat? Moses, you and your brother Aaron brought us out into this wilderness to starve us to death . . .” whined the newly freed Hebrew people. They had hardly set their feet on the other side of the Red Sea.
God seems to say pretty much, “Okay, Moses, I tell you what, you go and tell those people, I’m going to rain bread down from the skies for you. They can go out and gather each day’s ration. But it will be a test to see if they’ll live according to my teaching or not. And make sure they understand that on the sixth day, when they prepare what they have gathered, it will turn out to be twice as much as their daily ration.”
The expression “manna from heaven” has come to mean anything that may come to us unexpected and is beneficial to us. But in the original case “manna” was nothing fancy or luxurious; it was basic sustenance, “daily bread.” But most importantly, manna was a gift that was not to be hoarded; in fact it could not be hoarded. When the people try to gather more than their share, or hold onto it longer than they needed to the manna becomes worm ridden and a foul-smelling mess as one will find if you read on in chapter 16 v. 20.
With manna everyone has plenty, but no one has too much.
The leaders and the servants receive the same amount.
The people who work all day and the people who have little to do, receive the same amount.
The able and the disabled, receive the same amount: plenty, but not too much,
and it is all a gift!
Jesus encapsulated this gifting grace in the prayer he taught his disciples: “Give us this day our daily bread.” He reenacts it when in the wilderness he feeds thousands with just a few loaves and a couple of fish, and everyone has plenty and no one has too much.
And then Jesus teaches his disciples through parable that the reign of God is like “laborers in the vineyard.” Now many people read this parable as a story of “salvation” that whether you are a lifelong Christian and disciple of Jesus or a death bed confession believer you will be welcomed in “heaven.” Nothing wrong with such an interpretation I just feel it is incomplete. Whenever Jesus spoke of the reign or kingdom of God he always represented it as a present and coming reality. He taught that, “The Reign of God is among you, . . . within you, . . . in your midst.”
In the parable of the laborers in the vineyard, Jesus is saying that the reign of God is not going to be based on old catagories of the current world order: rich and poor, superior and inferior, clean and unclean, acceptable and unacceptable. It is not necessarily a “first come first served” ethic, but “the last shall be first and first shall be last” ethic.
Through this parable Jesus attempts to help his disciples break through the old presumptions and create the possibility of something new. Through this odd and unsettling story, Jesus both envisions the new order of God and unmasks the deadly spirits of the old order.
Jesus presents the reign of God in the church as the heart of this new reality. In the church, the world is to see an “alternative household of God’s kingdom.” In this vineyard, this wilderness, everyone receives the necessary “daily bread.” Not trying to be too obvious but this is where there is a tie in to Stewardship.
So it is a parable about grace (God’s grace toward us.)
A parable about grace (human to human grace.)
A parable about generosity (God’s toward us.)
A parable about knowing how much is enough.
A parable about TRUST . . . trusting God to provide for our needs not our wants.
Manna for the wandering Israelites . . . wages for the vineyard laborers.
And to this Jesus teaches in the prayer we will say in a bit,
“Give us this day our daily bread.”
It is not as the world might teach us to pray: “Give me this day my daily bread.”
There is an underside to this parable that I believe speaks to us, (at least it speaks to me) as one of the privileged in our society, as one of those has had the opportunity to work, if not from the beginning of the day, at least starting in the second or even third shift. I’m referring to the comment made by those who began laboring first in the vineyard when they found they weren’t getting more than what the last hired were given, “These last have only worked one hour, and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the day and the scorching heat.”
I’m reminded of the grumbling of Israel in the wilderness. The laborers complaint does not simply concern money or fair wages even; it goes much deeper, to what money, wages represents. The real issue is superiority: “you have made them equal to us.”
Work becomes not simply the means for earning daily bread, but a source of division and competition, a means of reinforcing the categories of winners and losers, superior and inferior, those of value and those of lesser value to society.
Work often plays this role in contemporary society. When people are out of work, they often feel inferior, even worthless, like the workers in the parable who waited all day in the marketplace: “. . . no one has hired us,” they poignantly tell the landowner.
Also in today’s overstressed workforce many people including pastors will often brag about their long hours of work, as a way of feeling self-important and superior to those with less demanding work.
Of course, the money earned from work is itself closely connected to status, often functioning as much to achieve superiority over others as it is to secure the necessities of daily life.
The complaint of the daylong workers – “you have made them equal to us” – takes some of us including modern day preachers to some deep places. It takes us beneath mere economics to the spirit that underlies so much economic competition – a spirit that is shaped by the metaphors of winners and losers, superior and inferior, of important and less important.
Now this is not to say that competition in business is not a good thing, it is and can be very good for the consumer. But it is to say that when society uses the results of such competition to divide us and separate us and to put others in a place of less value as children of God, that is wrong!
As some of you know, I am a fan of certain professional sports teams, but when I consider the ridiculous salaries they command and I consider their real value to our society say as compared to a school teacher or a first responder. I am troubled by the values this conveys to our young people and what it says about our society as a whole! The same for many CEOs.
Jesus clearly says speaking through the words of the parable’s landowner (God),
“Am I not allowed to do what I choose with what belongs to me? Or are you envious because I am generous? So the last will be first and the first will be last.”
The Greek there says “is your eye evil because I am good?”
The message of this parable seems to me is comes to us on two fronts.
First, the lesson of God’s grace and generosity. And our response to such grace and generosity is to extend the same to all others.
The second message perhaps is the more difficult for us to swallow and that is how in the reign of God, God’s generosity to us is not based on any supposed superiority we may feel we have and others do not have. But is bestowed upon us all, equally, without any thought to humanly contrived merit. We are all equally children of God in the Reign of God.
And as the body of Christ, the church’s mission assisted by the Holy Spirit is to usher in more and more evidence of this reign which while in our midst is not yet fully realized.
May it be so starting with us.
Listen to Pastor Neil Wilson share this Sermon by double clicking on “Download File” below. Enjoy.
If it hadn’t been for the all rain there wouldn’t have been much to talk about this summer at Old First Church on the Common.
But in fact it has been so rainy that when the Church Council found it necessary to expand the Clarice Mae Bradley-Stemple Memorial Garden (Earlier plans did not take into account the number of pets who have memorialized there.) it was determined that the only direction they could develop was sitting under 2 inches of water. And it wasn’t nice clean rain water but looked more like what Jed Clampet found bubbling up from the ground when shootin’ at some food. Except it wasn’t Texas Tea!
You see the end of the church’s leach field runs along that side of the Memorial Garden, the side where the grass is always nice and green.
As you can imagine, since this discovery, it hasn’t been as quiet around Old First Church, especially seeing as Sam Coleridge got involved. It gave him a chance to use his new Hitachi ZAXIS 8 mini excavator. So he began one day digging away with no apparent plan in mind. (Typical of Sam!) By the next Sunday the backyard of the church looked like a colony of 500 lb. gophers had moved in.
Beth Granger from the county Dept. of Septic and Sewers, did the perk test and had to share with the Council the bad news that it didn’t pass which meant that the church would need to enlarge the leach field.
As Beth was concluding her remarks to the Church Council, the first words out of Sam Coleridge were “Well, that’s just a bunch of crap.” To which Beth countered, “Yep, that’s your problem!”
The bigger problem, as it turned out, is that the only suitable direction to go is onto land owned by Mrs. Violet Small.
Mrs. Violet Small is a widow. Mr. Small (as she always referred to her late husband) died 20 years ago. The back of her 5 acres abuts the Clarice Mae Bradley-Stemple Memorial Garden. On this section there is the remnant of an old apple orchard that Mr. Small started when he and Mrs. Violet Small were first married. Without his attention for the past 20 years it has become a tangle of brush and overgrown apples trees, looking like a scene right out of a 19th century gothic novel.
It has become a favorite “haunt” of the neighborhood kids who like to go in there and help themselves to some of the better apples, and the wormy ones, well, they make great projectiles when flung from the end of a long limber maple whip stick!
And, as Mrs. Violet Small has pointed out to Rev. Williams, on more than one occasion, some of the rapscallions she has chased out of Mr. Small’s orchard were children from the church Sunday School! And just what was he going to do about it? Some Christian values they were teaching there at that church!
So when she showed up at the pastor’s office, her eyes aflame, and without even a “good morning”, she got right in his face and demanded, “That Sam Coleridge better not let the tiniest little bit of his digger thing cross over onto her property or there would be a lawsuit forth coming.”
She spun on the heels of her little black shoes and marched right back out past wide-eyed Abby Reynolds at her desk in the church office.
Well, that pretty much took care of the option to negotiate the purchase of even a narrow strip of her land for church’s environmental conundrum.
Council members discussed it at their next meeting. Some wanted to see if there wasn’t some alternative solution such as building a big mound system.
“The kids could always use it as a sliding hill in the winter.” Leslie Jordan offered.
The mound system wasn’t really a viable option because of the soil types in town, the report was quite clear on this, Howard Williams pointed out.
Some wanted to settle this ongoing dispute with Mrs. Violet Small once and for all, “But we will do it in a ‘Christian manner’ and follow the example laid out by Jesus in Matthew 18.” Bertie Dickson suggested. Then added, “And Pastor, we think you should be the one to approach, Mrs. Violet Small, you know, as Jesus said, ‘when the two of you are alone.’”
“You cowards” Rev. Williams thought to himself. Of all the times they would want to consider doing something in a “biblical manner” it would be now!
Yet, this is what they tried, to no avail. At least Mrs. Violet Small had the courtesy not to slam the door in the Reverend’s face like she did when Sam Coleridge and Howard Williams stopped by as when you are to “. . . take one or two others along with you . . .”
And of course the next step is to take it to the church, which was a mote point, by then everyone not only in the church but in all of Rockhaven knew about the squabble between the church and Mrs. Violet Small. In fact over at Joe’s Barber shop the whole affair had become known as the “The Church’s case of the Holythe (or unholy) Crap” and Sam Coleridge had been nicknamed “Cesspool Sam!”
Mrs. Violet Small, for a woman of short stature and little means was becoming an immovable stumbling block to any forward progress.
It was about this time, one Sunday morning, Jessie Packard, the nursery caregiver, was talking with the children about Jesus and his two commandments, you know, to love God and love one’s neighbor. And the children made cards that they were to take to the people who lived near them, their neighbors. Little Brucey Walton informed Jessie that he didn’t have any neighbors out where he lived on the Ricker Bluffs Road. So Jessie suggested that he think about who he might give his card to.
On his way out the back door of the of the church to play on the old swings, he looked up and saw an older person across the way in the old apple orchard, bent over picking up some branches that had fallen from one of the aged trees. To Brucey she looked sad and forgotten. He knew right then who he was going to give his card to, I mean after all wasn’t she the church’s neighbor.
On his way home Brucey went down the side street to a little house hidden back in the overgrown lilacs and arborvitae. He timidly stepped onto the porch and made his way by pots of dying geraniums and dried out chrysanthemums and knocked on the door. The door opened just a crack and Brucey saw the sad little woman standing behind it.
“We were, we were talking about loving our neighbors today in nursery and made these cards.” Brucey stammered.
“I don’t have any neighbors where, where I live out on Ricker Bluffs and I saw you and, and thought, well, you’re, you’re my neighbor at least while, while I’m at church.”
He held out the handmade card.
A hand quickly snatched the card and shut the door.
On the other side of the door Mrs. Violet Small muttered, “This is a new low for even you, Sam Coleridge, using children to get your way.” Yet she did take the time to open the card and read the simple note, “Jesus said ‘Love your neighbor.’”
That next Sunday during the Children’s time, a very pensive Brucey Walton questioned Rev. Williams, “Aren’t we supposed to love everyone, Pastor? Even those who may not be nice to us?”
“Well, yes, yes we are Brucey.” the Rev. answered.
“And didn’t you say once, that to love like Jesus isn’t about feeling all warm and mushy inside but about doing things that are like love?”
The Rev. had to think for a moment about that one. It had been at least a year ago he had spoken about that. If only half the congregation would have such a memory!
Well, undeterred in his faith, Brucey shows up again the next Sunday at Mrs. Violet Small’s house. This time he brought along two of his friends, Betsy Masters and Jimmy Buffington, and they all have handmade cards for their church neighbor.
This time the door opened a little bit more and Mrs. Violet Small took the cards as each of the children presented them to her.
This has been going on now for 3 or 4 weeks. At last count, I think four children were stopping by Mrs. Violet Small’s house every Sunday after church with a handmade card or sometimes a little something they foraged from the coffee hour. The parents had been noticing that their stays were growing a bit longer each week.
This last Sunday the morning scripture included the verse, “Love does no wrong to a neighbor, therefore, love is the fulfilling of the law.” Rev. spoke once again about love as more than a feeling for there are times when we may not feel love for some, in fact we may actually have bad feelings toward them, yet we can still show them love.
And it was earlier that same Sunday morning one of the children, actually it was Betsy Masters, came walking out of the orchard and across the backyard of the church with a few nice Macintosh apples in a little basket. And I overheard little Betsy say to Jessie Packard, “Oh Miss. Violet says it’s okay, so long as we come to her front door and ask. Here, Miss. Violet said these were for the coffee hour.”
The next day the Rev. as he walked up to the church saw Mrs. Violet Small out in the orchard and she appeared to be doing something with a hammer and stakes. When he got into his office Abby called out from her desk that Mrs. Violet Small called and wants to have a word with him. Rev. Williams took a deep breath and called Mrs. Violet Small. She asked if the Reverend would stop by later that day.
That afternoon Pastor Williams knocked on Mrs. Violet Small’s front door, which swung all the way open and she invited him in to her parlor. And he’s not sure, but as he passed by the kitchen door he thought he saw on her refrigerator a whole row of handmade cards with little stick figures, rainbows and hearts.
Go ahead, listen to the Audio version…Pastor Neil Wilson is quite the story teller and a faithful servant. Just select the link “download file” below and enjoy!
Everyone bears a name, and some of us have several names, (even a few nicknames).
There are first names that we have, be it John, Rachel, Pamela, the name that we are known by, the name if used, indicates familiar relationship. We call our closest acquaintances by their first name. These names may carry some significance, perhaps because of their meaning in a language of origin. How many of you know the meaning of your names? Has it influenced how you think of yourself?
For instance, my name, Neil comes from the Gaelic Niall, which is of disputed origin, possibly meaning “champion” or even “cloud”. So I guess this means I’m either a hero or an airhead! This was the name of a semi-legendary 4th-century Irish king, Niall of the Nine Hostages. In the early Middle Ages the name was adopted by Viking raiders and settlers in Ireland in the form Njal. In popularity Neil ranks 629th in the U.S. so I guess I’m not all that popular!
Then there is the family name, surname, which we grew up with, the name our parents bestowed upon us, by the nature of our family of origin. In bearing this name, a responsibility of sorts is placed upon us. The reputation of that name is handed down to us. It Is not just a name, but a family history, and it carries its tradition with it. Back in the little town where I grew up in if you were to go back there and mention the name “Wilson” there are those who would have certain preconceived notions about you just because you mentioned the Wilson name!
There are our middle names which some people find embarrassing. Often middle names are given because they sound nice (I have sister Kathryn Ann, Sylvia Mae) and sometimes they are given to honor the memory of a family member. For instance my middle name is Herbert. I was named after a great uncle Herb McAlister whose funeral my father had been to the day I was born.
Where we live in a city or town or a village, bestows a name upon us. We should be aware that what people think of the city or town may well be derived from what they think of us as individuals. When we share names, our family of origin is identified, or our place of birth, or our occupation, and we may be risking something of the reputation of any of those things, by what we say and do. What was Nathanael’s comment when he heard where Jesus was from? “Nazareth! Can anything good come from there?” (Jn. 1:46)
We know how easy it is for us to use somebody’s name if we want to get through red tape. By using a person’s reputation, by speaking about the person as our friend, who happens to be the boss of a company, or someone important and influential in the organization, we get a lever, an angle, which gives us an advantage. When we quote somebody’s name in a reference, or in letter of recommendation, we are taking hold of something of their reputation.
So, what’s in a name and what’s going on here when Jesus bestowed the name ‘Peter’ on this disciple, Simon?
Peter, Petros ‘the rock’ (and not the movie star!) To some he might better be known as ‘the rock that moved’, with his shaky faith and apparent inability to be consistent. Peter, ‘the rockslide’, in his headlong headstrong rush to express convictions without thinking of the implications and then living to regret the consequences. There are times when he was ‘rock headed,’ or unable to engage with the reality of being a true disciple and finding it tough to follow when it meant endangering his life.
Still, it was Simon, whom Jesus named Petros, to whom Jesus said using a bit of a play on words, “On this petra (rock), I will build my church and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it.”
Now there has been various ways which Jesus’ renaming of Simon to Peter has been interpreted. Traditionally it has been understood as Jesus saying that the church was built upon the person of Peter and his unique role in the ministry of the early church. This has led to among other things the concept of apostolic succession, the idea that there can be an authority bestowed upon bishops though the laying on of hands that can be traced back to the first apostles.
Another interpretation, (and a view that seems more plausible to me personally) is that “the rock” Jesus was pointing to was not Peter himself but Peter’s confession. When Jesus asks the disciples “But who do you say that I am?” Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the son of the living God.” It is upon this confession as the foundation, the rock, that the church will be built.
Still Jesus bestowed the name of Petros “rock” on the disciple known as Simon. Naming is important. Over and over in the Bible persons are given new names, places are given new names. In each case there is a good reason for such renaming. And often with the new name came new responsibilities and opportunities.
Simon’s new name changed him and his role in the mission of Jesus forever.
Imagine Jesus stepping into this sanctuary. He calls you by the name, the name we all know you by but says, “XXX You are no longer XXX but you are ???” For example if it were my spouse Donna Jesus might say “Donna, you are to be Madonna for you will be part of a new birth in the church.
What name might Jesus bestow upon you?
There is one surname by which we all go and that is “Christian.”
In this regard my name is not Neil Wilson but “Neil the Christian.” As I thought about this, some questions came to mind in light of Jesus’ renaming Simon to Petros “rock” and what this said about Simon and what it might have meant to the new Peter.
Is my reputation such that when my name is mentioned there is a positive reflection on the church of Jesus Christ?
How well am I doing at projecting the reputation of Jesus into the world?
Or, if I’m honest, there have been times when I’ve been embarrassed by my association with Jesus. Am I more like Judas, than like my favorite Andrew?
Just how much am I responsible by my inaction and neglect, my self-absorbed actions and selfish ways of living, for the poor reputation of the Church and her Christ in these times?
Have I evaded my responsibilities and in effect lived in denial of the faith I claimed? The Apostle Paul wrote in Romans (10:9) that we are to profess Jesus with our lips. True. But unless you are living in times of persecution it is easy to say I believe in Jesus, it is quite another to live that proclamation out in real life! But then Matthew (15:8) tells us that Jesus said, “These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me.”
What about you?
Are we living with the responsibilities bestowed up on us as people who confess Jesus as the Christ, Messiah?
Or have we trimmed and tidied the faith to suit us?
Can the world see a bit of Jesus in us?
A class of children was being taken through a church one day. The things they saw were patiently explained by their teacher, the pulpit, the altar, baptismal font, etc.. Then one little girl pointed to one of the stained glass windows. ‘Who are those people?’ she asked. The teacher explained that they were saints, which precipitated a discussion about how those people became saints.
After the tour, the teacher asked some questions to see what the children had learned. One of the questions was ‘Who are saints?’ The same little girl put up her hand and said, ‘Saints are the people the light shines through’.
What better answer would there be to describe those whose faith in action casts the light of Christ upon the needs of a suffering world?
By virtue of showing up here this morning, the name Christian will be attached to us not only by Jesus but also by the world.
What’s in a name? Perhaps a whole lot more that we might think!
Listen to our Audio Version by clicking on “Download File” below and enjoy Pastor Neil Wilson’s timely message.
“I ask then, has God rejected his people? By no means!”
Those who study New Testament Greek (more that I have) will tell us that what is translated as I just read, Paul uses language that is much more emphatic. They suggest it needs to be read with hand thumping the table and shouting “Absolutely not!”
It is with such passion that Paul answers his own rhetorical question: Has God rejected the people of Israel, the Jews? Absolutely not!
In the some of the verses that follow, which the lectionary leaves out, Paul uses a rather confusing explanation that has to do with branches being grafted onto a vine as a way of explaining the inclusion of Gentiles in God’s overall plan.
Today’s reading picks up Paul’s words at verse 29, where the apostle emphasizes that “the gifts and call of God are irrevocable.” God is not in the business of rejection but inclusion. Looking back on the 2000 years of Jewish/Christian relations, and in light of the silence of many white Christians over the violence in Charlottesville, and the church’s role historically and today in racism, the church would do well to remember this. And we must do more than casually reflect on it, we must repent of our past sins of if not commission then silence and move beyond remembering to realistic actions. “We” being not the “the church” in the generic but you and I.
In a fuller reading of Romans, we can hear Paul in a perpetual struggle with the reality that not all his fellow Jews have accepted Jesus as the Messiah. Paul simply cannot fathom anyone – Jew or Gentile – not wanting the wonderful life such as Paul himself experienced. We need to note, however, that Paul’s desire that the Jews come to the same understanding as he does, does not mean that they must. I may say “this is the best thing in the world, and you ought to try it” but my opinion, while valid, is nonetheless mine and therefore subjective.
It seems that Jesus has a similar frustration as Paul did. Confronted by a Canaanite woman (a Gentile) seeking mercy, Jesus responds that he was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel. At a glance this is rather unsettling for most of us. Isn’t this the same Jesus who accepts all kinds of people: men, women, children, foreigners, tax collectors, the rich and poor, the saint and the sinner? By all accounts, Jesus’ response implies that the woman is not deserving of God’s mercy.
Yet she persists, and Jesus relents.
I wonder if Jesus is actually out and out rejecting her, or is he merely venting his frustration. His own people, the very ones to whom Jesus has been sent, the ones he grew up amongst, have by-in-large not accepted him or his message. Now here he is, wandering in foreign territory, and this “outsider” recognizes and by virtue of her question, accepts his power and authority.
We can perhaps understand his frustration.
It is a little reminiscent of Matthews’ account of Jesus’ birth. Unlike Luke, who tells of local shepherds hearing the good news and proclaiming it to all who would listen, Matthew tells a different story. A story of foreign astrologers traveling a great distance to recognize the “king of the Jews.”
Foreigners and outsiders clearly figure into God’s plan for humankind. This is not the same thing as predestination, however. God does not have a specific plan for each individual, deciding long before our birth what our fate will be. Rather, God appears to have a plan, a dream, a hope for all humankind. How will we respond is pretty much left up to us!
If we read on a bit more in Romans in v. 36, we read Paul coming to an acceptance of a simple reality that would solve his dilemma. God’s ways are unsearchable and, ultimately, incomprehensible. God has ways of doing things that are beyond our knowing. We may not like the way things are going, but we can trust that God has things well in hand. (I know for some and for me at times this seems like a copout. But sometimes this is all we have and why we call it faith.)
Paul alluded to this earlier when suggesting that, just as the Gentiles were once nonbelievers, so now the Jews, and it’s all part of God’s planning. Using a rather circular argument, Paul suggests that God causes everyone’s disobedience so that, ultimately, everyone can receive God’s mercy.
In the Tuesday Bible Discussion group we’ve been considering the story of Joseph’s family. It is one of the longest stories in the Bible. A series of amazing events come together so that the people of Israel settle in Egypt. Some suggest that while there are many “teachable points” in this story, the long-term purpose was to set the stage for God’s profound act of mercy, the exodus. Without the people going into Egypt, they could not have been rescued out of Egypt.
The overarching lesson, we can trust God’s ways, even if we do not understand them or even like them.
But this begs the question, “does God make things – especially unpleasant ones – happen in order to teach us a lesson?”
Yes and No.
Some situations certainly fall within that category. Yet there is nothing to suggest that everything does. Anxiously trying to understand something beyond him, Paul comes to the conclusion that this – the Jews non acceptance of God’s new offer – is to teach people a lesson. We may tend to do the same thing. When we cannot understand what is going on around us, an easy explanation to which we can default is that God is teaching us something. It may be true, but there is no guarantee.
However, we can learn from all that happens around us, whether that was God’s intention or not, if we are open to God.
So I believe we might take for this passage two important lessons. The first is that God has not rejected the Jews or anyone else for that matter. What God has done is to widen the door to include all who wish to come in. All are welcome, all are included.
The second is that in the end God’s ways are often beyond our understanding, and that’s okay. Our faith in God can empower us to if not to accept then to work with what is going on in our lives – even when it’s not what we want, even when it makes no sense to us.
If we were to ask the question, “has God abandoned any of God’s people, ever?” we can give a resounding “Absolutely not!
Listen to the Audio version by selecting “Download File” and open on your desktop! Enjoy!
Sermon ~ Sunday, August 13th, 2017 ~ Pastor Neil Wilson
Did You Hear (See) That?
1 Kings 19:9-18
Have you ever had the experience of purchasing or leasing a new (or new to you) automobile and on your way home from the dealership you see four others identical to it?
Back in the dealership’s lot when you first laid eyes on it, the color and design and classy lines jumped out at you and said. “I’m yours! Just you and me baby! We’re going to be a stylish, unique pair, all eyes will be on us!”
But then, again, on your way home and for the next few days, weeks even, you see vehicles just like yours. They are everywhere!
A few years ago when we bought the green Honda CR-V we noticed two or three people apparently bought the same car at the same time we did. We brought our Subaru Forester home, suddenly we see our twins going by all the time! There can only be one explanation: We must be trend setters!
Actually there is another explanation: this experience is similar to what is called “frequency illusion”, or the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon. This is a cognitive bias which describes a curious psychological fact: after learning some bit of new information we start noticing it everywhere else.
Okay, interesting, but what does this have to do with Elijah and his experience of God on Mount Horeb?
Elijah was a great prophet, through whom Yahweh had performed some pretty amazing things, like the poor widow of Zarephath and her jug of oil that never ran out and subsequent resuscitation of her dead son. Then there was the challenge to the prophets of Baal and the fire from the sky to ignite the sacrificial fire which had been drenched in water. And if this wasn’t enough, the deaths of all the prophets of Baal, after which a prolonged drought came to an end. That last one might have been a bit too much. In fact it was for Queen Jezebel.
The Jewish king Ahab had married Jezebel who was a worshipper of Baal, and when she heard about the death of Baal’s prophets, she threatened to take the Elijah’s life which sends the prophet running for his life into the wilderness. Elijah travels about a day’s journey where he sits down under a tree and despairs for his life. Complainingly he prays: “It is enough, now, O Lord, take away my life, for I am no better than my ancestors.” (v. 4)
Yet, even on the run and with all his complaining, Elijah continues to experience God’s care and help. That night under the tree, an angel comes to him as he sleeps and provides him with food and water which miraculously sustains him for 40 days and nights! After these 40 days and nights Elijah makes his way to Mount Horeb and there he seeks the shelter of a cave. Mount Horeb, another name for Mount Sinai, is where God had appeared to Moses, considered the birthplace of Israel’s religion.
This is where our reading picks up the story. And it might be familiar one to some of you. Inside the cave, Elijah hears the voice of the Lord saying, “What are you doing here, Elijah?” And Elijah begins whining again about the state of his affairs. I paraphrase, “You know how faithful I’ve been Lord, so why is this happening to me?”
God tells Elijah to go out of the cave, stand on the edge of the mountain and wait, there Lord will pass by. In other words, “Elijah you want reassurance, I show you reassurance!”
There’s a great wind, so powerful rocks were shattering, but no sign of the Lord.
Next there came a shaking of the earth in a mighty earthquake, still, no Lord.
After the shaking, a fire and after the fire “a sound of sheer silence.”
Can one hear silence?
Can silence, as we say, be deafening?
Mighty winds . . . witnesses frequently describe tornadoes as sounding like freight trains.
Earthquakes rumbling deep in the earth are amplified by the earth like a huge speaker.
Next a fire. . . I personally have heard the sound of a forest fire crowning through the tops of spruce trees and it is a frightening sound!
Elijah, like many of us, might have expected God to show up in fury and power, the awesome spectacle of any of these. After all look at how he had experienced God up to this point. Some pretty amazing, in your face sort of ways!
There is that great scene in the movie Forest Gump where Lt. Dan has joined Forest on his shrimp ingredients boat. After not catching any shrimp for days, Lt. Dan asks Forest, “Where to H is this God of yours?” And in a voice over Forest says, “Its funny Lt. Dan said that, because right then, God showed up.” And they are caught in the wrath of a hurricane.
God showing up . . . There is a term for such manifestations or experiences of the Holy, they’re called theophanies. Elijah had had some fairly spectacular theophanies to be sure, but what Elijah seemed to need to learn was that God is not always found in the bright flashes of light or loud roaring of storms, spectacular events and portents in the heavens, but also in the quiet spaces in between. Perhaps more often in the quiet spaces in between, for there are far more of these in life.
Elijah like many of us needed to learn to create prayerful times and spaces filled with silence, set a part from the din and confusion of the storms and earthquakes in our lives.
Related to this is the tremendous influence that past experiences have on our ability to discern and experience divine activity in the present.
Elijah had experienced God in some pretty awe inspiring ways. But here God comes to him in the quiet after the storm, after the awe. Not maybe what he expected.
In our gospel reading, the disciples couldn’t believe what they were seeing in those early morning hours in the midst of a storm. They thought it was some sort of ghostly apparition. They had never experienced Jesus in that way.
We see what we have been “conditioned” to see. The Baader-Meinhoff phenomenon speaks of something we recently learned or experienced. Past experiences do have a way of shaping, coloring, the lenses though which we view our world.
For instance even though it has been over 26 years since I in any way made my living in the logging trade, I notice trees. And when I look at them I see white pine, red pine, eastern hemlock, red, white, black spruce, cedar, balsam fir where others see simply “pines” or “Christmas trees.” While I’m getting better and can make myself see trees for their intrinsic beauty and value, I still see potential board feet of lumber and cords of pulpwood. And when I look at a forest of trees I see the way the trees lean and the best location to fall them and the location of haul roads so as to do the least amount of damage to the residual stand.
I see what years of experience have conditioned me to see.
My thought for us today is: How do our past experierences bias our expectations of how God will reveal God’s self in our lives?
What have we done through prayer and study to shape and change those patterns of attention?
Do we fail to see God at work in our lives, in our church because we believe that God’s presence is always and only made manifest in certain ways, places and persons?
Have we taken the time and energy to open our eyes and ears; to be receptive to new movements of the Holy Spirit in our midst; or do we miss them because past experience limits our vision and hearing?
While God’s faithfulness and loving kindness never ends (Lamentations 3:22-23)and God is changeless. (Ps. 90:2 & 102:26-27) God is also about writing a new covenant on people’s hearts (Jere. 31:31-34) and doing new things (Is. 43:19).
When we look upon the forest of humanity around us or out upon the raging seas of life, what do we see, what to we hear? God is just as apt to be in the spaces between the trees and in the calm that follows the storm.
In the end God didn’t give up on Elijah even when Elijah prayed that God would. Elijah continues to prophesy to the rulers and people of Israel.
With a renewed or even new vision, as we are able to see God moving in new ways and doing a new thing imagine what will the church be capable of!
May we be so attentive to the movement of the Spirit in our midst that we will be saying to one another, “Say, did you hear that?”
LISTEN TO THE AUDIO VERSION OF THIS SERMON recorded live and read by Pastor Neil Wilson:
Have you ever noticed Jesus doesn’t begin his parables, “In a land far away there lived a beautiful princess . . .”
Not even, “In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit.”
But “In an ordinary field next door to you there was a farmer who planted some seed . . . A baker woman kneading some dough . . .”
I wonder if the crowds were a bit disappointed with Jesus. Maybe even some of his disciples as well. Jesus tells them one more parable about seeds and plants, followed by stories of baking bread, plowing a field, and fishing. Yes, he throws in one story about a wealthy merchant, but all the rest are as ordinary as a mustard bush.
No kings, or even princesses, inhabit this kingdom Jesus speaks about being so near.
No military generals or revolutionary leaders to please Simon the Zealot or his colleague Judas. They must have felt let down.
And what about us?
I wonder if our culture might be disappointed too with some of Jesus’ stories. For instance, I doubt most people’s vision of heaven or the reign of God includes mustard bushes and housework! God is more often seen as “Lord” or “King” than farmer or baker woman. And whether it is traditional hymns or modern praise music we sing about “enthroning” Jesus, “raising him up” and “exalting him in the highest heaven.”
Jesus though, tells stories of the kingdom and of heaven that are literally “down to earth.” Common stories about ordinary people, a tenant farmer, a housewife, fishermen, doing everyday things. This is hardly an exalted image of God’s realm!
And of course this is the whole point. As Christians we are called to believe in the incarnation, the mystery of the meeting of divine and human in the very human person of Jesus. Yet it is interesting that in his parables Jesus puts the focus not on himself but on the world around him. “The kingdom of God is like” some of the most common things in life. Like Jesus himself, this everyday world of ours embodies the sacred meeting of divine and human, sacred and secular, pious and profane. That is if we have the eyes to see and the ears to hear.
It is in this very mundane embodiment that Jesus’ parables differ from Greek or Roman myths or Aesop’s fables. Jesus’ stories contain no gods in human disguise or talking animals, just real-life women and men going about their everyday work.
According to Matthew, the first thing Jesus does when he comes out from his 40 days in the wilderness is proclaim, “The kingdom of God has come near.” He give examples of this every time he heals, reaches out to outcasts, respects women and other unrespectables, or cares for the poor. He illustrates that nearness through these kingdom parables.
Jesus’ kingdom is not some esoteric realm in the sweet by and by, but as close and real as the mustard bush in the neighbor’s field or the loaf of bread on the baking stone. This nearness, far more than any threat of eternal agony, is the basis for Jesus’ call to believe. Of these five parables, only the last includes any idea of apocalyptic judgement and gnashing of teeth. The rest envision God in every nook and cranny of daily life, from the kneading of dough to the plowing of fields. Jesus seeks to transform human life not by scaring the hell out of people, but by helping them see the heaven close at hand!
With such images Jesus echoes his and our faith ancestor Moses who in his farewell address to the Israelites reminded them that “the word is very near” them, in their hearts and close at hand. (Deut. 30) In his earthy kingdom parables Jesus affirms this.
Another thing Jesus does not do is use the seven wonders of the world to illustrate God’s kingdom. He doesn’t even use the stately cedar of Lebanon, but the lowly mustard plant. Its seed is a symbol of the tiniest thing, and the plant it produces is a trash tree! Or more accurately a trash bush, no matter how tall it grew. We might like Jesus to speak of the kingdom as like the mighty red oak or majestic white pine, but Jesus says the kingdom of God is like a farmer who planted scrub juniper or even Russian knapweed! How is that for an image of God’s realm? I imagine the disciples scratching their heads and asking themselves, “The Kingdom is like what?”
Then there is the leaven, the smallest amount enough to provide bread for a wedding feast. In a tradition where leaven is a symbol for corruption and impurity Jesus uses this as an agent of the miraculous growth of God’s kingdom. If God can use weeds and corruptible leaven to grow the kingdom, imagine what God can do with you and me!
Abundance from the smallest things, miraculous transformations from trash bush to tree of life, from corrupt leaven to bread enough to feed the multitudes. God’s kingdom is like that, according to Jesus.
And then in the next two parables we are told of people who gladly give up everything for that treasure. The extravagant response of the tenant farmer and the pearl merchant is matched only by the extravagant mustard bush and loaves of bread.
Of course the paradox is that the kingdom equal to the value of a great pearl or treasure is not made of silver or gold, but of bushes and bread. What would you give up for a old pasture overrun with an abundance of juniper bushes?
These are not simple moral fables in that they demand such decisions. Again like Moses’ last words, the parables stress our responsibility to choose God’s way even when it may not make sense! Moses framed it as a choice between life or death, blessing or curse. Jesus’ parables has the realm of God up against that of the evil one, good fish or bad fish. Like Moses, Jesus does not let us off the “hook.” The nearness of God’s realm challenges us daily to choose a way.
Unfortunately we live in a world where mustard comes in a plastic squeezable bottles, bread in plastic bags, both of which can be found on grocery store shelves. And pearls go for discount prices on the Home Shopping Network.
Has the church cheapened the kingdom as well?
Like the farmer plowing the field and the merchant searching for the invaluable pearl, what would you, what would this congregation, give up everything to possess? All the while remembering that the hidden treasure is not made of silver or gold or even an actual pearl! Nor is it made of wood or brick or stone or endowments funds and memorial accounts. And on the personal side it isn’t that lucrative job offer or business opportunity, it isn’t our retirement portfolios!
Rather Jesus is asking, “What would we give all these things up to possess?”
And then he offers images of things that in the end will not complete our personal estate or fully fund a church’s capital improvement fund but will bring us closer to the realm of God that is right there in our midst if we but have the eyes to see and the ears to hear!
So look around you today. Where do you (will you) see and hear parables of the kingdom?
Want to hear the Audio Version? Select the link below to listen to Pastor Neil Wilson sharing his Sermon on Sunday morning here at First Congregational UCC.
~ Sermon ~ Sunday, July 2, 2017 ~ Pastor Neil Wilson
There’s No Hiding Place Down Here
Matthew 10:40 – 11:1
“We have it in us to be Christ’s to each other . . .
to work miracles of love and healing as well as to have them worked upon us.”
Frederick Buechner writer, poet, theologian and Presbyterian minister made this assertion in A Room Called Remember: Uncollected Pieces. It could have been a commentary on our reading from Matthew’s Gospel. These closing words of Jesus’ instructions and warnings as he sends the twelve out like “… sheep into the midst of wolves” (10:16)
This passage contains the heart of Matthew’s gospel: a ageless call for the church to go out into the world in Christ’s name, as well as to receive and welcome the “little ones” of the world in Christ’s name.
When we read of giving a cup of cold water to the “little ones” perhaps our first thought is serving or feeding the children. Which is partially true, but mikros (Greek)refers not only to children but to those considered inferior and vulnerable.
This term “little ones” if it sounds like something else Jesus said, it should, for later in Matthew’s Gospel (chapter 25) Jesus speaks of serving the “least of these.” And Jesus will tell us that as we serve the “least of these” we are actually serving Him. It is in this same chapter we get a clue as to what the “reward” will be for those who indiscriminately meet human needs: Jesus says they inherit the Kingdom. The ones who have given food and drink to the hungry and thirsty, clothed the naked, cared for the sick, and visited those in prison are the ones who will know blessing, who will have both encountered Christ and embodied Christ.
Mother Teresa in her book Words to Love By reminds us that every day we encounter Christ in “distressing disguise.” We find Him in those “hungry not only for bread, but hungry for love; naked not only for clothing, but naked for human dignity and respect; homeless but not only for want of a room of bricks, but homeless because of rejection.”
Although our social and cultural context maybe vastly different from that of Jesus and then Matthew’s, the church’s call is the same: in spite of any and all opposition, we are to go out into the world, to alleviate human suffering and meet real needs. And as we offer these miracles of loving and healing through the offering of hospitable deeds and actions equivalent to the cup of cold water, we also go as those open to having the miracle of hospitality “worked upon us.”
In other words, we are called to both represent Christ to the stranger and to encounter Christ in the stranger.
Often though, the church is thought of as a place where we can go to meet Christ, and find a time and place to receive comfort and restoration. Which it is for sure. The church is meant to be a place where the hurting and wounded in body and spirit can find compassionate care and safety. The Church is after all referred to in Scripture as the body of Christ. But as pastor and author Barbara Brown Taylor reminds the church, “we are not merely consumers but also providers of God’s love.”
We’re not supposed to use the church solely as a place of to meet our own needs. For time to time yes, we can and should find the church a place to find personal healing and wholeness. But ultimately, Barbara Brown Taylor goes on to say, that the church is not a “hideout . . not the place where those of us who know the secret password can gather to celebrate our good fortune,. . . ”
When I read this I found myself humming the tune of the old country, blue grass gospel song, There’s No Hiding Place Down Here. One verse goes like this:
There’s no hiding place down here
There’s no hiding place down here
Well, I run to the rock just to hide my face
And the rocks cried out, no hiding place
There’s no hiding place down here
Just as I was writing these words, four young women came into the church. They were employed at the Weather Vane Terrace as seasonal chambermaids. Two were from Turkey the other two from China. After working through some significant translation obstacles, I learned they were looking for affordable bicycles. Two bicycles would be enough they could share. I made three phone calls and within 5 minutes had options of four bicycles for them. They were not looking for much, just something less expensive than the retail price of bicycles at the local shops and stores. Was this a “cup of cold water?”
You know one of the things I realize is that by having an office person and our church building open as much as we do, we often find ourselves as the church where things such as this happen.
We are the church whose purple doors are not locked!
Now, I do not presume to know the complete mind of Jesus, but I think Jesus would have told his disciples, if it were the 21st century, to not lock your doors. To be open for business, his business, to be what is talked about today as a “missional” church.
In our Tuesday morning Bible study lesson we read about how with Jesus and the early church there seems to have been far more emphasis on helping and comforting, healing and raising than on the exact words and teaching they (we?) should use. More emphasis on the doing than on the saying, more emphasis on doing good that on holding the “correct” beliefs. Later Church Councils would argue over the words and “correct belief”, for the time being the Holy Spirit would be enough.
There is no such thing as church that is not a missional church. Inasmuch as the church in its local and denominational expressions has been preoccupied with institutional survival, rather than being God’s witnesses sent into the world to bless all people, we have essentially not been the church.
So it is good to have unlocked doors, not only does it allow others access, but more importantly, through them we are sent out into the world and out there we are to be witnesses of Christ and to be witnessed to by the presence of Christ in others. Even the least of these, no, especially the least of these!
The church is not a place to play “hide and seek!” In the same way God found Adam and Eve hiding in the garden God will seek us out, out of the church and into the streets and homes and neighborhoods where there are little ones in need of a cold cup of water or maybe a couple of bicycles.
Listen to the Audio version below by clicking on “Download File” and enjoy.